Skip to content
← CatalogueHistory200 levelCreated by AI

History

Guru Amar Das Ji: Social Reforms — Caste, Sati, Purdah, and Widow Remarriage

Professor: Giani Ditt Singh Source: SikhLibrary

This course examines the social reform agenda of Guru Amar Das Ji, focusing on his challenges to four major oppressive practices of sixteenth-century Punjab: the caste system, sati (widow immolation), purdah (the veiling and seclusion of women), and the prohibition on widow remarriage. Students will explore both the theological foundations and the practical implementation of these reforms, situating them in their historical context and tracing their ongoing significance.

Begin course12 lessons · 10-question test · 80% to pass
Created by AI. Drafted with AI and reviewed for accuracy. Spotted an error? Tell us.
Prerequisite recommended. This is a 200-level course. To get the most out of it, we recommend completing the 100-level courses first.

What you'll learn

  • Describe the social practices of sati, purdah, and caste discrimination in sixteenth-century Punjab
  • Explain Guru Amar Das Ji's theological critique of each of these practices
  • Analyze how Guru Amar Das Ji's reforms were implemented institutionally through the Langar and Manji system
  • Evaluate the historical impact of these reforms on Sikh community life and women's status
  • Connect Guru Amar Das Ji's social reform agenda to broader Sikh theological principles of equality and human dignity
  • Assess the legacy of these reforms for contemporary Sikh social ethics

Key terms — ਸ਼ਬਦਾਵਲੀ

ਸਤੀ

The practice of a widow immolating herself on her husband's funeral pyre — condemned by Guru Amar Das Ji

ਪਰਦਾ

The veiling and seclusion of women from public life — challenged by Guru Amar Das Ji's open congregational practice

ਵਿਧਵਾ ਵਿਆਹ

Widow remarriage — supported by Guru Amar Das Ji against prevailing social prohibition

ਜਾਤਿ

Caste; the hereditary social stratification system challenged throughout Sikh teaching

ਊਚ ਨੀਚ

High and low; the hierarchical distinctions of caste that Sikh teaching rejects

ਬਰਾਬਰੀ

Equality; the social vision grounded in the theological affirmation of divine light in every person

ਇਸਤ੍ਰੀ

Woman; the dignity and spiritual equality of women is affirmed throughout Gurbani

ਸਮਾਜ ਸੁਧਾਰ

Social reform; the deliberate transformation of unjust social practices through teaching and example

ਮਨੁੱਖਤਾ

Humanity; the common human dignity that grounds Sikh ethical claims

ਅਕਾਲ ਪੁਰਖ

The timeless Being; the divine who created all human beings equally

Lessons

1. Introduction: Reform as Spiritual Imperative

Full course contents
  1. Introduction: Reform as Spiritual Imperative
  2. Social Conditions for Women in Sixteenth-Century Punjab
  3. Sati: The Practice and Its History
  4. Guru Amar Das Ji's Condemnation of Sati
  5. Purdah: The Veiling of Women
  6. The Guru's Open Congregation: Challenging Purdah
  7. Caste Discrimination and the Sikh Critique
  8. Langar as Anti-Caste Practice
  9. Widow Remarriage: Social Prohibition and Sikh Support
  10. The Manji System and Women's Leadership
  11. Gurbani on Gender Equality
  12. Legacy and Ongoing Significance

Social Reform as Theological Expression

Guru Amar Das Ji's social reform agenda was not a pragmatic accommodation to progressive ideas of his time but an expression of core Sikh theological convictions. The foundational Sikh teaching that the divine light (ਜੋਤਿ) is present in every human being — regardless of gender, caste, religion, or social status — carries direct implications for social practice. If every person carries the divine within them, then practices that humiliate, oppress, or deny the humanity of any person are not merely unjust but spiritually wrong — they are a refusal to honor the divine presence in that person. Guru Amar Das Ji's social reforms flowed from this theological foundation.

The Reformer's Context

Guru Amar Das Ji operated in sixteenth-century Punjab — a society with deeply entrenched social norms around gender, caste, and religious practice. The practices he challenged — ਸਤੀ, ਪਰਦਾ, caste discrimination in shared meals and worship, and the prohibition on widow remarriage — were not minor customs but core elements of the social order, reinforced by religious tradition, economic interest, and social pressure. Challenging them required both theological clarity and institutional courage. Guru Amar Das Ji brought both, using the institutional tools at his disposal — the Langar, the Sangat, the Manji system, and his own example — to implement reforms that had enduring consequences.

Giani Ditt Singh's Legacy

This course draws on the tradition of social-reform Sikhism articulated by Giani Ditt Singh (1853–1901), the reformist scholar and activist who used Gurbani's egalitarian teachings to challenge caste discrimination, untouchability, and superstition within the Sikh community. His work with the Singh Sabha movement demonstrated that the social reform impulse of Guru Amar Das Ji's era remained alive and necessary centuries later. The reforms Guru Amar Das Ji initiated were not once-and-done historical events but ongoing challenges that each generation of the Sikh Panth must take up in its own context.

2. Social Conditions for Women in Sixteenth-Century Punjab

Patriarchal Society

Sixteenth-century Punjab, like most of the contemporary world, was organized on patriarchal principles: social, legal, religious, and economic authority resided primarily with men, and women's lives were largely defined by their relationships to male relatives — father, husband, brother, son. The high-caste woman in particular was subject to elaborate restrictions designed to protect her chastity (understood as the family's honor) and maintain caste purity. These restrictions included purdah (veiling and seclusion from public life), restrictions on remarriage after widowhood, and in extreme cases, the expectation of sati. Low-caste women faced different but also severe constraints — economic exploitation alongside social stigma.

The Status of Widows

Widowhood was a particularly vulnerable condition for women in sixteenth-century Punjab. Upon a husband's death, a widow lost her primary social identity and economic support. Remarriage was socially prohibited for high-caste women — a widow who remarried was considered to have dishonored her deceased husband's family and her own. The alternative to sati — remaining as a widow, often in a condition of social isolation, economic dependence on in-laws, and ritual inauspiciousness — was itself a form of social death for many. The cultural idealization of sati as the ultimate expression of wifely devotion added ideological pressure to an already desperate material situation.

Religious Justifications

These social restrictions were not maintained by social pressure alone but were given religious justifications in the dominant religious traditions of the period. The Dharmashastra literature of the Brahmanical tradition provided scriptural authorization for caste hierarchy, the subordination of women, and in some versions the practice of sati. Challenging these practices therefore required not only social courage but theological argument: demonstrating from within the religious framework that these practices were actually contrary to genuine spiritual teaching. This is exactly what Guru Amar Das Ji did — using Gurbani to undercut the theological foundations of oppressive practices.

3. Sati: The Practice and Its History

What Was Sati?

Sati — the practice of a widow immolating herself on her deceased husband's funeral pyre — was found in certain communities of northern and western India from at least the medieval period. The word derives from the Sanskrit sati meaning a true and virtuous wife; the practice represented the ultimate expression of this virtue in the ideological framework that justified it. As Mandair (2013, 102) notes, sati was not universal even among the communities where it occurred — it was practiced mainly among high-caste groups, and its frequency varied considerably by region and time period. Nevertheless, it existed as an institution, ideologically valorized and socially reinforced.

Coercion and Idealization

The idealization of sati in certain strands of Hindu devotional culture presented it as the voluntary act of a supremely devoted wife — a spiritual achievement that would lead to great religious merit and reunite the couple in the afterlife. In practice, however, sati was often coerced — by family members who did not want the social and economic burden of a widow, by community pressure, and by the construction of the alternative (widowhood) as so shameful and difficult that death seemed preferable. Even in cases where the widow appeared willing, it is difficult to speak of genuine free consent within such a coercive social context. Historians debate the extent to which historical satis were truly voluntary; what is clear is that the social structure made genuine choice extremely difficult.

Sati in Sixteenth-Century Punjab

The incidence of sati in sixteenth-century Punjab varied by community and social group. Among some Kshatriya and merchant families, it was practiced and idealized. Guru Amar Das Ji's condemnation of the practice was directed at a real social phenomenon in the community he served, not an abstract one. His condemnation was also part of a broader pattern of bhakti movement critique: other medieval saints had also challenged sati, though often without the institutional means to implement change that Guru Amar Das Ji had through the Sikh Panth's organized community structures.

4. Guru Amar Das Ji's Condemnation of Sati

The Theological Argument

Guru Amar Das Ji's condemnation of sati drew on the fundamental Sikh theological teaching about the human person. Every human life is a gift from the divine — ਅਕਾਲ ਪੁਰਖ's own creation, inhabited by the divine light (ਜੋਤਿ). To take one's own life — even under social pressure, even in the name of devotion — is to destroy the divine's creation. The ideological framework that valorized sati as wifely devotion was precisely the kind of social convention that Gurbani consistently challenged: outer performance of religious devotion that does not reflect inner spiritual truth. A woman who burns herself is not honoring her husband or demonstrating her devotion to the divine; she is submitting to social coercion wrapped in religious language.

In Gurbani

The Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji contains explicit condemnation of sati. The verse attributed to Guru Amar Das Ji states that those who call themselves sati and burn themselves are not truly sati — true sati is the woman who bears the pain of separation from her husband (by living on after his death) with patience, endurance, and devotion to the divine. This redefinition is rhetorically sophisticated: it does not simply reject the valorization of female virtue embodied in the concept of sati but transforms it — defining true ਸਤੀ as inner devotion and steadfastness rather than outer immolation. The woman who lives virtuously, supports her family, and maintains her spiritual practice is the true sati.

Institutional Implementation

Beyond theological argument, Guru Amar Das Ji implemented anti-sati norms through the Sikh community's institutional structures. The Manji system — the network of local Sikh community leaders established to organize the growing Panth — was used to spread the Guru's teaching against sati, provide support for widows within the community, and create social alternatives to the practice. Within the Sikh community, widows were to be supported, not isolated or pressured toward self-destruction. This institutional dimension of reform — not only teaching but creating the social conditions in which the reformed practice was possible — is characteristic of Guru Amar Das Ji's practical wisdom.

5. Purdah: The Veiling of Women

What Was Purdah?

The ਪਰਦਾ system — from the Persian/Urdu word for curtain or veil — refers to the practice of female seclusion and veiling that was widespread across northern India in the sixteenth century, in both Muslim and Hindu upper-caste communities. Under purdah, women of respectability were expected to remain within the domestic sphere, avoid the gaze of unrelated men, cover their faces in public, and not participate freely in mixed public gatherings. The degree of purdah varied by community, region, and economic class — lower-caste and poorer women often could not afford the luxury of full seclusion — but as a social ideal for respectable women, it was widely held and enforced.

The Effect on Women's Spiritual Life

Purdah had direct consequences for women's access to religious life. If a woman was required to remain veiled and secluded, her ability to participate in public worship, to hear Gurbani sung in congregation, to seek the Guru's presence, and to participate in community life was severely limited. The Sikh theological teaching that the divine is accessible to all — that no intermediary is required, that the congregation is open to everyone — was in direct tension with the purdah system. A congregational worship practice open to all in principle but inaccessible to half the population in practice is a contradiction that Guru Amar Das Ji refused to maintain.

Guru Amar Das Ji's Practice

Guru Amar Das Ji's challenge to purdah was institutional and practical: the ਸੰਗਤ at Goindval was explicitly open to men and women together, without veiling requirements. Women participated in the congregation on equal terms — sitting in the same space, listening to the same Gurbani, eating in the same Langar. Traditional accounts describe Guru Amar Das Ji actively discouraging the practice of veiling among Sikh women attending the congregation. According to Macauliffe (1909, vol. 2, 88), he would address women directly, encouraging them to lift the veil and participate openly in the community's spiritual life. This active encouragement was itself a significant social intervention.

6. The Guru's Open Congregation: Challenging Purdah

The Congregation as Counter-Practice

If the purdah system maintained women's seclusion as the norm, then a congregation that gathered men and women together was already, by its very existence, a counter-practice. Every time a woman entered the Goindval ਸੰਗਤ without veil, sat beside men of all castes, and participated in Gurbani and Langar, she was enacting a different social reality — one in which gender boundaries were not the organizing principle of community life. Over time, regular participation in such a congregation reshapes what participants understand as normal and possible. The congregation does not merely teach equality as an abstract principle; it enacts it daily.

Women as Teachers and Leaders

Guru Amar Das Ji's open congregation also created space for women's leadership within the Sikh community. The Manji system included women among the 146 appointed district leaders — an extraordinary innovation for the period. Women were trained in Gurbani, authorized to teach and lead ਸੰਗਤ in their communities, and given formal roles in the organizational structure of the Panth. As Grewal (1990, 47) notes, this appointment of women to positions of religious leadership was without close parallel in the religious institutions of sixteenth-century Punjab. It reflected a genuine commitment to the theological principle of spiritual equality across gender.

The Long-Term Impact

The anti-purdah practice established under Guru Amar Das Ji had long-term consequences for the Sikh community's gender norms. While purdah practices were never completely eliminated — social change is slow and uneven — the normative standard established by the Guru created an ongoing critique of veiling and seclusion within the Sikh community. In the modern period, Sikh women's relatively prominent participation in public religious life — serving as Granthi (scripture readers), as Ragis (musicians), as members of Gurdwara committees — reflects a tradition that Guru Amar Das Ji's open congregation helped establish.

7. Caste Discrimination and the Sikh Critique

Caste in Sixteenth-Century Punjab

The caste system in sixteenth-century Punjab was a pervasive social reality structuring economic life, marriage patterns, ritual practice, social interaction, and access to education and religious authority. At the top, Brahmin and Kshatriya families claimed religious and martial authority respectively; in the middle, various artisan and merchant castes (ਜਾਤਿ) occupied specialized economic niches; at the bottom, communities deemed ritually impure by the dominant tradition were subjected to systematic exclusion and exploitation. As Grewal (1990, 32) notes, caste hierarchy was not only social but cosmological — it was understood as divinely ordained and maintained by religious sanction.

The Gurbani Critique

The Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji contains numerous direct and indirect critiques of caste hierarchy. The fundamental critique is theological: caste claims that a person's birth determines their spiritual worth and social status. Gurbani insists that the divine light (ਜੋਤਿ) is present in every human being regardless of birth — that what matters spiritually is not ਜਾਤਿ but ਭਗਤੀ (devotion). The inclusion in the Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji of compositions by saints of low-caste origin — Bhagat Kabir (weaver), Bhagat Ravidas (cobbler), Bhagat Namdev (calico printer) — alongside those of high-caste figures is itself a theological statement: the divine speaks through whomever the divine chooses, and birth-caste is irrelevant to this choice.

Guru Amar Das Ji's Direct Challenge

Guru Amar Das Ji's challenges to caste were particularly direct and institutionally expressed. His requirement that all visitors eat in the Langar before being received — applied without exception — was an anti-caste practice in the most literal sense. High-caste visitors who wished to see the Guru had to eat food prepared by and alongside low-caste Sikhs. The composition of the Manji system's leadership including people of low-caste background was a direct challenge to the caste monopoly on religious authority. And Guru Amar Das Ji's own personal conduct — his equal treatment of visitors regardless of caste — modeled the anti-hierarchical principle that his teachings articulated.

8. Langar as Anti-Caste Practice

The Most Direct Challenge

Of all the institutional practices that challenged caste hierarchy in Sikh community life, the Langar was the most direct and daily. As discussed in the Langar course, eating together across caste lines was the most visible and socially charged violation of caste norms in sixteenth-century Punjab. For Guru Amar Das Ji, the Langar was therefore not merely a charitable feeding program but a deliberate and ongoing anti-caste practice — a daily enactment of the theological claim that all human beings are equal before the divine. The requirement that visitors eat before seeing the Guru made this practice inescapable for anyone who wished to be part of the Sikh community.

The Akbar Episode and Its Significance

The episode of Emperor Akbar eating in the Langar (discussed in the biographical course) takes on additional significance in the context of anti-caste reform. Akbar, as a Mughal Emperor, occupied a position of supreme social status in the political hierarchy. His willingness to eat in the Guru's Langar — sitting on the floor alongside people of all backgrounds — was not merely a demonstration of personal humility but a symbolic statement about the relationship between worldly power and the Guru's equality-based community. In the Langar, even imperial power is irrelevant: what matters is the willingness to acknowledge one's common humanity with all others in the divine presence.

Long-Term Consequences

The Langar as anti-caste practice had significant long-term consequences. While caste discrimination did not disappear from Sikh communities — human beings are resistant to change, and social patterns persist for generations — the normative standard established by Guru Amar Das Ji created an ongoing internal critique. A Sikh who discriminates against a fellow Sikh on the basis of caste is, in the framework established by the Gurus, violating the core principles of their own tradition. This internal critique has been articulated repeatedly throughout Sikh history — in the Singh Sabha reform movement, in the work of figures like Giani Ditt Singh, and in contemporary Sikh social justice advocacy.

9. Widow Remarriage: Social Prohibition and Sikh Support

The Prohibition and Its Effects

In sixteenth-century Punjab, the remarriage of widows was strongly prohibited in upper-caste communities. A widow who remarried was understood to have dishonored her deceased husband's memory, violated the bond of marriage, and compromised the family's purity. The prohibition was maintained through social pressure, religious sanction, and economic dependence — widows who relied on in-laws for support were in no position to challenge the family's expectations. The effects of the prohibition were severe: widows were frequently relegated to a life of social isolation, economic insecurity, ritual inauspiciousness, and restricted freedom. In a society where a woman's social identity was defined by her relationship to a man, the death of that man left her in a condition of social limbo.

The Sikh Theological Position

Guru Amar Das Ji's support for widow remarriage drew on the same theological foundation as his other reforms. If every human being has the divine light within them and is worthy of dignity, then a woman who has lost her husband is not thereby diminished in her humanity or her spiritual worth. Her capacity for love, companionship, and family life does not end with her husband's death. The prohibition on remarriage was a human social convention, not a divine command; and a human convention that causes suffering and denies human dignity is open to challenge from within a tradition that takes the dignity of every person seriously.

Practical Support

Guru Amar Das Ji's support for widow remarriage was expressed both in teaching and in the community's social practice. Within the Sikh community, remarriage by widows was explicitly permitted and not stigmatized. The Manji system provided a network of community leaders who could support widows, help them find new marriages if desired, and maintain the social environment in which such decisions could be made freely rather than under coercion. This practical dimension of reform — providing the social infrastructure that makes new practices possible — reflects Guru Amar Das Ji's characteristic combination of theological vision and institutional wisdom.

10. The Manji System and Women's Leadership

The Manji System

The Manji system — the network of 146 district leaders established by Guru Amar Das Ji to organize the growing Sikh Panth — is discussed in more detail in the dedicated Manji course. In the context of social reform, its significance lies in its inclusion of women among the appointed leaders. Some of the 146 Manjis were women — devout Sikhs trained in Gurbani, authorized to lead congregations, teach, and serve as the Guru's representatives in their communities. This appointment of women to formal positions of religious leadership was without parallel in the dominant religious institutions of the period.

Women as Gurbani Teachers

The women appointed to Manji positions were not passive representatives but active teachers and leaders. They conducted congregational worship, taught Gurbani, resolved community disputes, and maintained the Sikh community's practices in their districts. Their authority was derived not from gender privilege or family connection but from their knowledge, devotion, and the Guru's trust. As Macauliffe (1909, vol. 2, 91) notes, this represented a fundamental innovation in religious organization — women as formal teachers and leaders of mixed-gender congregations, in a society where women were expected to be subordinate and secluded.

The Precedent Set

The inclusion of women in the Manji system set an important precedent for the Sikh Panth's understanding of religious leadership. Whatever the practical limitations of subsequent history — and Sikh women have faced ongoing struggles for equal participation in institutional religious life — the precedent established by Guru Amar Das Ji remained as a normative reference point. The Gurus did not exclude women from religious leadership; that exclusion, where it has occurred, represents a departure from the foundational example rather than its continuation. The ongoing struggle for women's equal participation in Sikh religious institutions is therefore not a departure from tradition but a return to it.

11. Gurbani on Gender Equality

The Foundational Affirmation

The Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji contains what is perhaps the most direct affirmation of women's spiritual equality in classical South Asian religious literature. The verse by Guru Nanak Dev Ji that challenges the treatment of women — asking how one can call impure those who give birth to kings and prophets — has been widely cited as a foundational Sikh affirmation of women's dignity. But it is in Guru Amar Das Ji's compositions that this affirmation is most fully developed and most directly connected to social practice. As Shackle and Mandair (2005, 72) note, Guru Amar Das Ji's verses on women consistently challenge the notion that gender marks any difference in spiritual capacity or worth.

The Body That Gives Life

Guru Amar Das Ji's verse in praise of the female principle is among the most celebrated in the Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji's treatment of gender. It challenges the widespread South Asian tradition of viewing women's bodies as ritually polluting, particularly during menstruation and childbirth. The verse points out the theological incoherence of this position: if the divine is present in all, and if all human life originates through women's bodies, then those bodies cannot be sources of pollution. The divine does not work through a polluted medium. This is not merely a theoretical argument but a direct challenge to the ritual practices of caste purity that used the female body as one of their primary sites of concern.

Equal Access to Liberation

Across the Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji, including in Guru Amar Das Ji's compositions, women are consistently described as equally capable of liberation (ਮੁਕਤਿ) through devotion to ਨਾਮੁ. There is no suggestion that women require more lifetimes, different practices, or male intermediaries to achieve the spiritual goal. The path described in Anand Sahib — Naam simran, sewa, sangat — is identical for men and women. This theological equality is the ground for the social reforms that Guru Amar Das Ji implemented: if women are equal before the divine, they must be treated as equal within the human community that claims to serve the divine.

12. Legacy and Ongoing Significance

Historical Impact

Guru Amar Das Ji's social reforms had significant historical impact on the Sikh community, though the extent and pace of change should not be overstated. Within the Sikh Panth, the norms Guru Amar Das Ji established — against sati and for widow remarriage, against purdah and for women's congregational participation, against caste discrimination in shared meals and religious leadership — became the normative standard by which Sikh community practice was evaluated. Departures from these norms were departures from the Guru's teaching, identifiable as such and subject to critique within the tradition's own framework. As Singh (1994, 92) argues, this normative impact, even where practice fell short, represents a genuine contribution to the development of more egalitarian social relations within the Sikh community.

The Singh Sabha and Giani Ditt Singh

The social reform agenda of Guru Amar Das Ji found its most direct nineteenth-century expression in the Singh Sabha movement and in the work of Giani Ditt Singh. The Singh Sabha, responding to what it saw as the corruption of Sikh practice by Hindu caste norms and superstitious accretions, mounted a major reform effort that explicitly drew on the Gurus' teachings. Giani Ditt Singh's polemical writing, his newspaper work, and his institutional efforts within the movement consistently invoked Guru Amar Das Ji's example as the standard for authentic Sikh practice. The social reform tradition of Sikhism is not an external imposition on the tradition but its own self-renewal through return to its foundational principles.

Contemporary Relevance

The social reforms of Guru Amar Das Ji remain relevant in the contemporary period, both within the Sikh community and more broadly. Caste discrimination, while illegal in India, continues to affect the lives of Dalit Sikhs and others in practice. Gender inequality in Sikh religious institutions — women's limited representation in Gurdwara management, debates over women's role in the Akal Takht, ongoing discussions about gender-equal practice in all contexts — reflects unfinished work. The theological foundation that Guru Amar Das Ji articulated — every person carries the divine light, therefore every person deserves equal dignity — remains as clear and as demanding as it was in the sixteenth century. The specific applications change with changing circumstances; the underlying principle does not.

References & further reading

  1. Santokh Singh, Kavi. Sri Gur Pratap Suraj Granth. Patiala: Bhasha Vibhag Punjab, 1962.
  2. Macauliffe, Max Arthur. The Sikh Religion: Its Gurus, Sacred Writings and Authors. Vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1909.
  3. Singh, Harbans. The Heritage of the Sikhs. New Delhi: Manohar, 1994.
  4. Grewal, J. S. The Sikhs of the Punjab. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
  5. Mandair, Arvind-Pal Singh. Sikhism: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.
  6. Fenech, Louis E., and W. H. McLeod. Historical Dictionary of Sikhism. 3rd ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2014.
  7. Shackle, Christopher, and Arvind-Pal Singh Mandair. Teachings of the Sikh Gurus: Selections from the Sikh Scriptures. London: Routledge, 2005.

From the source text

ਦੂਸਰਾ ਕਾਰਨ ਯੋਗਤਾ ਹੈ ਜਿਸਦਾ ਭਾਵ ਇਹ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਕਾਯਯਾ ਵਾਲਾ ਪਦ ਭੀ ਯੋਗ ਹੋਵੇ ਅਯੋਗ ਨਾ ਹੋਵੇ, ਜੈਸਾ ਕਿ ਘੜੇ ਦੇ ਨਾਲ ਤਾਂ ਲਓ ਆਓ ਪਦ ਦੀ ਯੋਗਤਾ ਹੈ ਪ੍ਰੰਤੂ ਜੇ ਪਰਬਤ ਲੈਆਓ ਯਾ ਚੰਦ ਲੈਆਓ ਆਖੀਏ ਤਾਂ ਕਾਯਯਾ ਤਾਂ ਪੂਰੀ ਜਰੂਰ ਹੋ ਜਾਏਗੀ ਜੋ ਪਦ ਨੂੰ ਪਦ ਦੀ ਸੀ ਕਿੰਤੂ ਉਹ ਯੋਗ ਨਹੀਂ ਸੀ ਇਸ ਵਾਸਤੇ ਉਸਤੇ ਪੂਰਾ ਸ਼ਬਦ ਦਾ ਗਿਆਨ ਜੋ ਨਿਸਚਯ ਆਤਮਕ ਹੈ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੁੰਦਾ, ਕਿਉਂਕਿ ਜੇ ਕਿਸੇ ਆਦਮੀ ਨੂੰ ਆਖੀਏ ਕਿ ਚੰਦ ਲੈ ਆਓ, ਯਾ…
The second reason is suitability (yogta), which means that the object of the action must be capable of being acted upon. For example, there is suitability in the phrase "bring a pot," but if one says "bring a mountain" or "bring the moon," the action of "bringing" is physically possible in a general sense, but the object itself is not suitable for such an action. Therefore, a definitive and certain understanding of the word cannot be achieved. If someone is told to bring the moon or a mountain, they will laugh and consider it absurd. Thus, suitability must exist within the words or sentences. The third is proximity (sannidhi), meaning the words should be without delay or gap, so that the structure of the words and the meaning can be clearly understood.
— from Durga.Parbodh.by.Giani.Ditt.Singh. Gurmukhi is the author's original text (OCR); the English is a machine translation. Both are short study excerpts — refer to the original for an authoritative reading.Read the full work on SikhLibrary ↗

Flashcards — ਕਾਰਡ ਅਭਿਆਸ

Click a card to flip it and reveal the definition.

Click to reveal

Course test

Pass with 80% or higher to complete the course and unlock the next one.

1. What was 'sati'?
2. What does 'purdah' refer to?
3. How did Guru Amar Das Ji redefine 'true sati' in Gurbani?
4. How did Guru Amar Das Ji challenge purdah institutionally?
5. What social position regarding widow remarriage did Guru Amar Das Ji take?
6. What was distinctive about the Manji system's leadership in relation to gender?
7. What is the theological foundation for Guru Amar Das Ji's social reforms?
8. Which nineteenth-century Sikh reformer most directly invoked Guru Amar Das Ji's social reform legacy?
9. What does Gurbani say about the ritual purity status of women's bodies?
10. Guru Amar Das Ji's challenge to caste discrimination was implemented MOST directly through which institution?

Read the source texts

Read the primary sources for yourself — the Gurbani in our read-along reader, and the original works in the source library.

Read Gurbani (reader)This work on SikhLibrary ↗SikhLibrary dataset ↗Dig deeper in the Sikh Archive →

Rate this course

…

Discussion & Q&A

Sign in to post.